From the HBD Archive
From: ingr!b11!wiley!wiley@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Blowoff (glass vs. plastic)
Date: 1989-12-23 03:06:21 GMT

Chris Shenton <chris@asylum.gsfc.nasa.gov> writes:
> I'm using plastic for primary (~3 days), glass for secondary. I'm a bit
> leery of going all-glass, as a couple of my super-heavy (OG > 1.060)
> batches have blown the lid off my primary; it's a tight fit getting the lid
> on, so pressure must be intense. I now hook up a blow-off tube -- rather
> than a fermentation lock -- for the primary, and I've *still* gotten
> blow-up. The beers have (fortunately) ended up tasting fine, so I don't
> think it's wild yeast partying-down...
>
> With this kind of pressure, I'd worry about glass shrapnel from a carboy
> primary. Any thoughts? Ideas why heavy brews blow up? Thanks.

Some other members of the club and I have switched to 1.5 inch diameter
blow off tube. It's just the perfect size to fit into the neck of a
carboy plus you can clean it with a bottle brush. I have had great
success using it thus far even with copious quantities of blow off.
Further, I've never even heard of anyone getting one clogged. The
tubing is available from:
Alternative Beverage
627-A Minuet Lane
Charlotte, NC 28217
1-800-365-2739 (except NC)

As for glass vs. plastic, I've had many fewer infection problems
after switching to all glass. I know that plastic primaries are
convenient, but wild things have the best chance at your brew before
your carefully selected bugs have had a chance to start. Thus, it
would seem that glass primaries are more important than glass secondaries.

dave wiley
uunet!ingr!b11!wiley!wiley


Back New Search

The posts that comprise the Homebrew Digest Searchable Archive remain the property of their authors.
This search system is copyright © 2008 Scott Alfter; all rights reserved.