Subject: immersion-type wort chiller (concern)
Date: 1990-03-02 03:19:06 GMT
> From: tony g <giannone@BBN.COM>
> I was thumbing through my Zymurgy "Yeast & Beer" (1989 special issue) last
> night when I came upon an interesting statement in Paul Farnsworth's
> "Healthy Homebrew Starter Cultures" article. On page 11 Mr. Farnsworth says
> "Cooling the wort before transferring it to the fermenter, using ice
> immersion or a copper cooling coil placed inside the boiling pot vastly
> increases the chance of contamination."
> I thought that using an immersion-type wort chiller would vastly 'decrease'
> the chance of contamination since it allows the yeast to be added sooner.
> Is Mr. Farnsworth assuming that the wort chiller is being place in the
> wort 'after the boil' instead of 'during the last 10-15 minutes'?
I was disappointed with that article. I completely disagree with
Farnsworth's contention that an immersion chiller coil increases the
chance for contamination. Ice immersion, of course, would be a
completely different story. However, if you practice healthy
sanitation procedures with your primary, and let the immersion coil
rest in the boiling wort for 10 - 15 minutes prior to starting the
flow of cooling water, there is no additional risk of contamination.
Douglas Roberts |
Los Alamos National Laboratory |I can resist anything
Box 1663, MS F-609 | except temptation.
Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 | ...
(505)667-4569 |Oscar Wilde
The posts that comprise the Homebrew Digest Searchable Archive remain the
property of their authors.
This search system is copyright © 2008 Scott Alfter; all rights reserved.