From the HBD Archive
From: florianb@tekred.cna.tek.com
Subject: re: yeasts and rumors
Date: 1990-03-01 16:06:08 GMT

A couple of issues ago, Mark Stevens commented on my question about
SN yeast:

>good, pure strain. Heurich said that if a brewery does NOT use
>only a single strain that they risk infection of the strains
>by each other and that by restricting your brewing to that single
>strain you can better maintain its purity. This

However, in the same issue, BRW commented that SN uses two yeasts in their
brewing. I've heard a similar claim from other sources.

This sort of discussion isn't really important to my brewing, since I use
either package or liquid yeast. But it does serve as an example of how
the brewing industry and hobby are full of rumors everywhere you look.

Case in point: I made two identical brews using the Wyeast British yeast
and hydrated Red Star ale yeast. The Red Star produced a cleaner, clearer,
tastier beer, a whole lot faster. Other Wyeast ale yeasts have, however,
given me much better performance than the dry yeast.

Florian the doubting.


Back New Search

The posts that comprise the Homebrew Digest Searchable Archive remain the property of their authors.
This search system is copyright © 2008 Scott Alfter; all rights reserved.